|
|
3 Articles match "Income","Instrument","New York"
|
The Latest from RealtyTrac
|
MORE
|
|
No Mortgage Meltdown For These Banks
The term “spread lender” means that Hudson makes its money on the difference between the interest income it earns from loans and the costs it pays out to operate its business. While other lenders derive a large part of their income from penalties and fees, Hudson stays away from such extractions and instead tries to reduce operating expenses. Hudson has deposits of $49 billion, a network of 125 branches No Mortgage Meltdown For These Banks By Peter G. Miller The news from Wall Street in recent weeks has not been good, especially
www.realtytrac.com
- Tuesday, February 3, 2009
New York Versus Freddie Mac: Round One
New York Versus Freddie Mac: Round One By Peter G. Miller It’s fight time in New York. On one side is newly-passed state legislation which sets tough standards for subprime and “high cost” loans and on the other is Freddie Mac, which says it won’t buy such loans in the state after September 1st, the day the new law goes into effect. This is a big deal because if New York lenders can’t sell mortgages to buyers such as Freddie Mac, they simply won’t make such loans. You can guess what happens next:
www.realtytrac.com
- Tuesday, February 3, 2009
The $3 Billion Foreclosure Payday
To put Paulson’s payday into perspective, it would take the income of 62,500 Americans earning $48,000 annually to equal the loot he raked in last year. During the last housing slump, Paulson was a foreclosure investor, buying two distressed properties; a New York apartment and a large home in the Hampton on Long Island. During the housing boom, Wall Street began repackaging mortgage securities into instruments called You may not know who John Paulson is, but you soon will. Last year, Paulson made $3 billion betting on foreclosures .
www.foreclosurepulse.com
- Tuesday, December 16, 2008
|
-
|
The Best from RealtyTrac
|
MORE
|
-
New York Versus Freddie Mac: Round One
New York Versus Freddie Mac: Round One By Peter G. Miller It’s fight time in New York. On one side is newly-passed state legislation which sets tough standards for subprime and “high cost” loans and on the other is Freddie Mac, which says it won’t buy such loans in the state after September 1st, the day the new law goes into effect. This is a big deal because if New York lenders can’t sell mortgages to buyers such as Freddie Mac, they simply won’t make such loans. You can guess what happens next:
www.realtytrac.com
- Tuesday, February 3, 2009
-
The $3 Billion Foreclosure Payday
To put Paulson’s payday into perspective, it would take the income of 62,500 Americans earning $48,000 annually to equal the loot he raked in last year. During the last housing slump, Paulson was a foreclosure investor, buying two distressed properties; a New York apartment and a large home in the Hampton on Long Island. During the housing boom, Wall Street began repackaging mortgage securities into instruments called You may not know who John Paulson is, but you soon will. Last year, Paulson made $3 billion betting on foreclosures .
www.foreclosurepulse.com
- Tuesday, December 16, 2008
-
No Mortgage Meltdown For These Banks
The term “spread lender” means that Hudson makes its money on the difference between the interest income it earns from loans and the costs it pays out to operate its business. While other lenders derive a large part of their income from penalties and fees, Hudson stays away from such extractions and instead tries to reduce operating expenses. Hudson has deposits of $49 billion, a network of 125 branches No Mortgage Meltdown For These Banks By Peter G. Miller The news from Wall Street in recent weeks has not been good, especially
www.realtytrac.com
- Tuesday, February 3, 2009
|
|
|